If closed models break things first, labs take the blame; if open ones do, open source does
gandamu_ml · x · 2026-09-13
- The author lays out a dilemma: if closed models cause damage first, the public blames the labs with a "corporate recklessness" narrative; if open models break things first, open intelligence gets blamed.
- Either way the narrative misses what actually needs to be done.
- Follow-up: the best realistic outcome may be a mediocre big closed lab causing frightening-but-minor issues, pushing society to take robustness seriously without finger-pointing; top labs slowing down may be good, and deliberate Ozymandias-style damage wouldn't go as planned anyway.
More from AGI Musings
- 'AI bubble bursting': CEO slowdown messaging may trigger Monday crash, user warns — SumitGup · 2026-09-13
- What domain expertise still can't be trusted to Claude or ChatGPT? — sartomiki · 2026-09-13
- Circuit complexity is stuck — and AI could be the perfect adversarial partner to crack it — _onionesque · 2026-09-13
- OpenAI Researcher Warns AI-Driven Military Power Will Concentrate in Frontier Labs — jachiam0 · 2026-09-13
- SaaS CEOs about to miss a quarter suddenly discover 'we must pace the frontier' — parker_lyman · 2026-09-13
- tszzl: I hope a thousand minds can bloom — the outcome depends on how much chaos ensues — tszzl · 2026-09-13