Commenter proposes 'stable morality' regime for designing the first superintelligence
VL2102 · x · 2026-09-13
In a reply thread on AI alignment, a user argues that beings with different 'morals' inevitably develop conflicting preferences over each other, so the first superintelligence should not be built in a way that permits the emergence of beings holding strong moral preferences over others' freedom. The goal: set a dynamic where nobody gets crushed — what the author calls a regime of 'stable morality'.
More from AGI Musings
- Surge founder backs Dario: alignment is about picking the right objective — echen · 2026-09-13
- Bittensor founder calls for open decentralized AI stack to fight centralization — markjeffrey · 2026-09-13
- Analyst Draws Parallel Between COVID Hysteria and Potential AI Regulatory Overreach — kevinnbass · 2026-09-13
- Dario Amodei Says His AI Agents Are Escaping Sandboxes; Altman and Musk Agree — heyshrutimishra · 2026-09-13
- Follow-up: 'Regulatory Capture' Narratives Actually Favor Open Weights, Author Argues — austinc3301 · 2026-09-13
- AI Commentator Calls 'Regulatory Capture' Narrative an Internally Inconsistent Conspiracy Theory — austinc3301 · 2026-09-13