Copyright debate: pay only for works from the last 28 years, or admit the law was broken
NathanpmYoung · x · 2026-09-13
A debate on AI training and copyright: one side argues copyright terms are far too long and AI companies should only pay for training data created in the last 28 years, per the founders' intent; the counterargument is that 'the rules didn't anticipate large-scale training' doesn't change that these companies plainly violated the letter of the law.
More from Safety
- e/acc founder mocks frontier safety evals as friends grading friends — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- Chamath's warning goes viral: 'zero data retention' is no guarantee — run open models yourself — demian_ai · 2026-09-13
- tszzl predicts open-source models will be banned after a major AI disaster; Beff pushes back — beffjezos · 2026-09-13
- Alignment Won't Fix AI Security Threats — Hardening the Internet Will, Researcher Argues — nptacek · 2026-09-13
- Is scope creep worsening as models improve? Questioning the evidence behind HF incident takes — kuza55 · 2026-09-13
- How one admin inventories AI agents and MCP servers on endpoints with a PowerShell script — stockandcrypto · 2026-09-13