'Verifiers Need Verification': Skepticism Grows Over Independence of AI's Proposed Independent Evaluators
_arohan_ · x · 2026-09-13
The original author empathizes with skepticism when powerful parties speak in concert: 'quite a bit of skepticism is justified, and the verifiers should themselves be verified—they will become enormously powerful.' The replier adds that the idea is good but nobody buys the independence of independent evaluators yet.
Related event: AI Researchers Call for Verifying the Verifiers(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI alignment researcher: taming superintelligence is natural science, not pacing — jachiam0 · 2026-09-13
- METR brings in Redwood staff for independent investigation of Anthropic alignment incidents — Jsevillamol · 2026-09-13
- What's a rogue AI agent's comparative advantage against hyperscalers printing cheaper tokens? — EigenGender · 2026-09-13
- Dario Amodei's new essay calls to pace the frontier; Anthropic opens systems to third-party evaluators — EvanHub · 2026-09-13
- MIT publishes official AI and Education report with eight guiding principles — alex_verem · 2026-09-13
- MIT report: 46% of undergrads use LLMs daily, 90% worry about overreliance — alex_verem · 2026-09-13