Frontier-pacing AI rules would be terrible regulatory capture, argues tszzl
trq212 · x · 2026-09-13
Arguing to skeptics in government and elsewhere, tszzl contends that 'pacing the frontier' regulation would compress the margins of frontier labs, imposing costs asymmetrically on the US developers with the strongest AI — making it by nature a terrible regulatory capture tactic. trq212 amplified the point in agreement.
Related event: Amodei, Altman and Musk unite on slowing AI, sparking debate over motives(62 posts)→
More from Safety
- AI memo: China to restrict exports of 23 AI technologies, plus Kimi K3.1 Pro and Genie 4 — dralandthompson · 2026-10-31
- Anthropic adds invisible text watermark to Claude outputs starting Nov 3 — petesena · 2026-10-31
- LessWrong essay: AI lab employees are 'microdosing' their org's spirit, argues researcher — jankulveit · 2026-10-31
- Stanford prof publishes lab AI policy: no AI-authored text in papers, ever — ChrisGPotts · 2026-10-31
- Security researcher: air-gapped AI agents are only possible with open-weight models — wunderwuzzi23 · 2026-10-31
- Podcast: Is Mistral Large 4 the West's best open model? Plus AI cyber threats — The Cognitive Revolution · 2026-10-31