Researcher Pushes Back on Claim That Safety Rules Aim to Kill Open Source
Afinetheorem · x · 2026-09-13
Responding to the popular claim that labs back safety monitoring only to kill open source, Afinetheorem argues: if neutral safety rules genuinely harm open models, that itself is worth worrying about—and no major lab considers the world's 15th-best model a competitor worth fretting over.
More from AGI Musings
- Dario Amodei Calls to Pace the Frontier; Anthropic Grants Third-Party Evaluators Permanent Access — ns123abc · 2026-09-13
- AI Existential Risk Is Shifting From Far Mode to Near Mode, Commenter Argues — EigenGender · 2026-09-13
- AI existential risk is shifting from far mode to near mode in people's minds — EigenGender · 2026-09-13
- Frontier lab staff privately probe raw models with 'evil' questions and self-psyop into fear — tawnniee · 2026-09-13
- Tyler Cowen: Mathematicians must accept being handmaidens to AI, and it will outwrite me too — sebkrier · 2026-09-13
- Researchers Flag Gaps in Amodei's Pacing Plan: Auditors May Be Fooled by Sandbagging Models — ziv_ravid · 2026-09-13