Investor claims Amodei's 'pacing' essay is illegal stock promotion ahead of Anthropic IPO
TinfoilTricorn · x · 2026-09-12
Brian Roemmele published a long thread alleging Dario Amodei's We Must Pace the Frontier is not a safety paper but regulatory-capture-flavored market conditioning during a quiet period.
His argument hinges on timing: Anthropic confidentially filed an S-1 on June 1, is expected to publish its prospectus in late September, and is targeting a mid-October listing at a floated $1.5–2 trillion valuation — while the pacing essay was published September 12. He cites Section 5(c) of the Securities Act, which treats "offers" broadly during the pre-filing phase.
The accusation is the author's personal opinion with no regulatory action behind it, but it captures the controversy swirling around Anthropic's "slow down" narrative ahead of a landmark IPO.
More from AGI Musings
- The smartest AI safety and e/acc people are far more nuanced offline than on Twitter — danfaggella · 2026-09-13
- Sam Altman backs Dario's frontier pacing call, pledges independent evaluators — but logits access history resurfaces — MaziyarPanahi · 2026-09-13
- Researchers: AI developers must show real-life benefits to earn trust — dhadfieldmenell · 2026-09-13
- Altman and Musk appear to side with Dario on frontier AI pacing — Hesamation · 2026-09-13
- Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Dario Amodei all agree on pacing the AI frontier — altryne · 2026-09-13
- Mollick: Anthropic and OpenAI's clearest hints yet that some form of recursive self-improvement has been achieved — emollick · 2026-09-13