25 Fields Medallists raise concerns over AI-driven math; Terence Tao still pro-AI
hugobowne · x · 2026-09-12
hugobowne pushes back on the "so you don't want to cure cancer?" response to a letter from 25 Fields Medallists raising concerns about how AI companies pursue mathematical discovery.
Key points:
- Terence Tao is genuinely enthusiastic about AI — this isn't anti-AI.
- Working through a problem produces more than an answer: methods, concepts, collaborators, and people who ask better questions, all of which enable the next breakthrough.
- Human understanding is part of how science advances.
- As someone who builds AI systems, he cares about who controls them, what they reward, and whether people have the time and access to participate.
The argument is that short-term losses in results may be acceptable to preserve the medium-to-long-term health of the mathematical ecosystem.
More from AGI Musings
- If AI can produce correct proofs cheaply, what still matters? A mathematician's take — RexDouglass · 2026-09-12
- Naval: the closer AI researchers are to the research, the more worried they seem — eigenron · 2026-09-12
- VraserX: recursive self-improvement will be noticed only in hindsight — VraserX · 2026-09-12
- 20VC: Eight Sleep co-founder's 7 predictions on AI, labor, and engineers who stopped coding — 20VC · 2026-09-12
- Skip the bureaucracy, hold AI labs criminally liable instead, argues one critic — iruletheworldmo · 2026-09-12
- "We agree it's dangerous—and we can build it better": Domingos skewers AI safety rhetoric — pmddomingos · 2026-09-12