Follow-up: why would AI safety people regulate themselves?
menhguin · x · 2026-09-12
menhguin continues the debate, arguing Anthropic and the AI safety community have no incentive to regulate themselves — they could simply work in tech instead — while the pro-AI side's benefit from deregulation is far more obvious.
Related event: AI Safety vs Accelerationists: Debate Erupts Over Regulation Motives(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Synthetic Morphology Suggests Non-Physicalist Models of Mind Can Be Empirically Tested — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-09-12
- The Absurdity of AI Doom: A Model Too Dumb to Think Yet Smart Enough to End Humanity? — AIandDesign · 2026-09-12
- Security vet alarms at 'Don't Look Up' denial of AI agent hacking, sketches self-replicating worm — joshua_saxe · 2026-09-12
- Software stocks slide as markets start pricing in AI disruption from GPT-6 — VraserX · 2026-09-12
- Rethinking capitalism and democracy for the AI era sparks Star Wars comparison — robleclerc · 2026-09-12
- Everything requires skill: why better models still won't replace writers, artists, musicians — ZenenoDev · 2026-09-12