AI safety advocates push back on 'regulation is censorship' claim
menhguin · x · 2026-09-12
menhguin responds to 0xfoobar's claim that AI safety regulation is a pretext for censorship and control, arguing the safety community has been consistent on AI risk and that regulation would not benefit people regulating companies they run — Jacob having already left his.
Related event: AI Safety vs Accelerationists: Debate Erupts Over Regulation Motives(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Tao and Fields Medalists' two objections to AI in math, and why they're weak — RexDouglass · 2026-09-12
- Balaji: Courage and agency are the last moat in the AI era — beffjezos · 2026-09-12
- jon_stokes argues Yudkowsky's definition of intelligence is narrow and brittle — nptacek · 2026-09-12
- Physicist mourns as AI compresses the timelines of what's possible in math — kylekabasares · 2026-09-12
- Mathematicians' meltdown over AI cracking Navier-Stokes mirrors a real Atlantic piece: 'I'd Rather Risk Cancer Than See AI Move This Fast' — adam_dorr · 2026-09-12
- 15-year consultant: no one 'picks things up' across industries — binarybits · 2026-09-12