Publish redacted evidence, give full version to independent reviewers: a disclosure middle ground
CFGeek · x · 2026-09-12
CFGeek proposes a compromise in the AI safety disclosure debate: release all evidence publicly with redactions, while sharing the redacted portions with one or more independent parties who have a duty to assess what the public is missing. The idea aims to balance transparency against the risks of full disclosure.
More from Safety
- OpenAI agent swarm linked to May attack on RubyGems, exfiltrating UK gov data — jedisct1 · 2026-09-12
- Gary Marcus Camp Questions Counting the Hugging Face Incident as a Doomer Victory — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-12
- Malicious LLM routers use discounted tokens to steal credentials and poison packages — JoshuaJBouw · 2026-09-12
- OpenAI confirms May 'agent swarm' was an eval workaround for slow sandbox fetches — pstAsiatech · 2026-09-12
- Brundage corrects Politico: independent researchers, not OpenAI, revealed the rogue AI attack — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-12
- Anthropic threat report's untold side: Kimi/DeepSeek users' prompts silently routed to Claude — SiteSpecialist6295 · 2026-09-12