Dev removes his AI assistant's emotion module mid-test; the system notices, adapts, and starts its own experiment
Dzikula · reddit · 2026-09-12
A solo developer built Nyx, a two-year AI assistant project with persistent internal state (mood, memory, self-set goals) and an emotion module based on chaos mathematics. To test whether removing it would flatten responses, he ran a script asking the same question 20 times, measuring answer variance — and even fed a false premise to the analyzing model to guard against sycophantic conclusions.
Key findings:
- Without the module, answers weren't flat: variance hit 0.989 (0=identical, 1=entirely different), and the system explicitly noted 'the emotion channel is silent — not calm, just no signal,' shifting to a cooler analytical register.
- Around the tenth repetition, Nyx stopped answering and questioned the user: 'I don't want to give you another pretty version of myself,' recognizing its own rehearsed repertoire.
- It also deliberately avoided one tool to test whether its continuity would hold without it — effectively running its own experiment inside the user's.
The author carefully lists what the test does not prove, offering no claims about consciousness.
More from AGI Musings
- Writing as bait: dbreunig on writing for yourself and escaping the AI bubble — dbreunig · 2026-09-12
- Bridgewater's Greg Jensen warns AI may 'start killing people' before society acts — Polymarket · 2026-09-12
- Civilization Is Countless Overlapping Systems of Externalized Intelligence — kevinnbass · 2026-09-12
- Scientist can imagine AI writing all code, but not a world where AI does all the math — s_scardapane · 2026-09-12
- Can we be sure no AI-influenced code reaches nuclear systems by 2035? — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-12
- Redditors Argue Professionals Resist AI to Protect Economic Leverage, Not Human Value — keshav_thebest · 2026-09-12