Academic AI writing policies need a Dogma 95: pledge 0%, not 'just a little'
paulnovosad · x · 2026-09-11
In a debate over academic AI-use policies, paulnovosad argues for a Dogma 95-style hard pledge: since everyone claims they only use AI for 3% of their writing while visible evidence suggests otherwise, scholars should either promise 0% post-AI polish outright—like Von Trier promised zero post-production trickery—or refrain from making dogmatic proclamations. The point of a dogma is to remove the slippery slope.
Related event: Debate Over Academic AI Writing Policies: Zero Tolerance or Leeway(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Ex-OpenAI safety researchers slam Paul joining board: "Altman is accountable to nobody" — RichardMCNgo · 2026-09-11
- vboykis laments that nobody writes code anymore amid AI hype about threats, proofs and IPOs — vboykis · 2026-09-11
- Anthropic pretraining researcher quits over safety; critic maps the funding web behind AI-safety advocacy — r0ck3t23 · 2026-09-11
- 'If Fable wasn't AGI, neither is Astra' — and the debate is collapsing into definitions — haider1 · 2026-09-11
- NYT's Kevin Roose: AI Doom Talk Went Fringe to Mainstream in Six Months — kevinroose · 2026-09-11
- Open-Weight Models Close In on the Frontier; Cures and Pathogen Risks Share One Root — Justin_Halford_ · 2026-09-11