'A ChatGPT subscription won't turn a hobbyist into a scientist' — the results-vs-understanding debate continues
gerardsans · x · 2026-09-11
Continuing the 'vibe mathing' thread: trying to convince someone with zero interest in understanding, purely results-driven, is a wasted day — a hobbyist will never become a scientist no matter how good their ChatGPT subscription is.
More from Fun
- Claude spends 45 minutes painting a portrait in JS Paint via Chrome — best computer-use demo yet — _sholtodouglas · 2026-09-11
- Was Anthropic alum Jacob Coxon's viral resignation an AI-regulation psyop? — theimposingshadow · 2026-09-11
- Legal AI tools under fire: Legora fails at parsing basic NDA termination dates — ctjlewis · 2026-09-11
- Viral pen meme: 'don't talk to me, I'm busy writing stuff down' — kyliebytes · 2026-09-11
- Scientist wireheads a fly with boosted dopamine and forces it to doomscroll 'FlyTok' — DynamicWebPaige · 2026-09-11
- "I turned the fly bisexual": a bizarre AI demo goes viral — AugusteToulmouche · 2026-09-11