Hullman concedes refusals add noise, but lax vetting forces such tactics
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-09-11
In a follow-up, Jessica Hullman acknowledges that reviewer refusals add noise and aren't a long-term solution. But she argues journals encourage exactly these workarounds when vetting is too lax — reviewers will find other cues, and many venues may need the push to build better mechanisms.
Related event: Scholars Propose Reviewers Refuse Suspected AI-Written Papers(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- Cathedral, a startup of ex-DOGE staffers, says it breached Anthropic's internal systems — ScottNover · 2026-10-27
- Prompt turns Claude Code into an iPhone backup forensics tool exposing 30-day 'deleted' photo copies — alex_verem · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic reveals it bans customers worth 5-7% of revenue every 9 months — Polymarket · 2026-10-27
- AVERI independently audits Amazon's internal AI safety evals in landmark pilot — Miles_Brundage · 2026-10-27
- US chases AGI dominance while China, EU and ASEAN treat AI as public infrastructure — BubblyExtent1693 · 2026-10-27
- Agent Field Kit launches $29 security runbooks for production AI agents — alvelda · 2026-10-27