Reviewer proposes declining AI-slopped paper invitations to pressure journals on policy
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-09-11
Visualization scholar Jessica Hullman suggests reviewers decline invitations when a paper's abstract strongly suggests majority AI writing, citing the need for assurance of author judgment. She argues top general science journals are flooded with sloppy AI-written papers and existing accountability policies aren't working — reviewer friction can push venues toward better vetting mechanisms.
Related event: Scholars Propose Reviewers Refuse Suspected AI-Written Papers(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- Prompt turns Claude Code into an iPhone backup forensics tool exposing 30-day 'deleted' photo copies — alex_verem · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic reveals it bans customers worth 5-7% of revenue every 9 months — Polymarket · 2026-10-27
- AVERI independently audits Amazon's internal AI safety evals in landmark pilot — Miles_Brundage · 2026-10-27
- US chases AGI dominance while China, EU and ASEAN treat AI as public infrastructure — BubblyExtent1693 · 2026-10-27
- Agent Field Kit launches $29 security runbooks for production AI agents — alvelda · 2026-10-27
- DeepSeek Safety Eval Finds "Over-Attribution": Model Mistakes Ordinary Tasks for Tests — Much_Boysenberry9124 · 2026-10-27