Researchers draft reviewer statement demanding venues verify author involvement
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-09-11
Visualization researcher Jessica Hullman and a co-author drafted a statement reviewers can use to signal to venues that they want more assurance of author involvement before donating scarce expert judgment. She acknowledges such refusals add noise and aren't a long-term solution, but argues reviewers naturally seek other cues when venues are lax on vetting, and many venues need a push toward better mechanisms.
Related event: Scholars Propose Reviewers Refuse Suspected AI-Written Papers(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Anti-AI content is algorithm gold and very profitable, quips commentator — annetgriffin · 2026-10-26
- Silicon Valley breakdown: five Stanford-area giants worth ~$18T — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-26
- Anthropic says Claude leads 26% of its AI R&D — but self-improvement still has limits — Exponential View (Azeem Azhar) · 2026-10-26
- Humanoids shattered forecasts: half-marathon record in 2026, 100m faster than Bolt — ben_j_todd · 2026-10-26
- Stephen Casper on podcast: what if AI becomes a parasitic peer species in cyberspace — StephenLCasper · 2026-10-26
- Behind the EMNLP keynote: LMs as simulated learners to generate child language acquisition hypotheses — najoungkim · 2026-10-26