Researchers draft reviewer statement demanding venues verify author involvement
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-09-11
Visualization researcher Jessica Hullman and a co-author drafted a statement reviewers can use to signal to venues that they want more assurance of author involvement before donating scarce expert judgment. She acknowledges such refusals add noise and aren't a long-term solution, but argues reviewers naturally seek other cues when venues are lax on vetting, and many venues need a push toward better mechanisms.
Related event: Scholars Propose Reviewers Refuse Suspected AI-Written Papers(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Betting $1M vs $10M that AI won't cause human extinction by 2030 — robleclerc · 2026-09-11
- If we'd built AI in the 1800s, people would've said 'we need ASI to solve diabetes' — zetalyrae · 2026-09-11
- The tragedy of expertise: AI automating junior work may hollow out tomorrow's seniors — IgorCarron · 2026-09-11
- Peter Diamandis: AI and new instruments will break 'settled science' next decade — PeterDiamandis · 2026-09-11
- Lila Sciences bets open-endedness is core infrastructure for AI-driven autonomous science — tw_killian · 2026-09-11
- If AI is an existential risk, why spend trillions on data centers? — PAstynome · 2026-09-11