Researchers draft reviewer statement demanding venues verify author involvement
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-09-11
Visualization researcher Jessica Hullman and a co-author drafted a statement reviewers can use to signal to venues that they want more assurance of author involvement before donating scarce expert judgment. She acknowledges such refusals add noise and aren't a long-term solution, but argues reviewers naturally seek other cues when venues are lax on vetting, and many venues need a push toward better mechanisms.
Related event: Scholars Propose Reviewers Refuse Suspected AI-Written Papers(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- US senator slams AI industry for proposing 50-death threshold for 'catastrophic incident' — peterwildeford · 2026-10-27
- Understanding the AI consciousness debate: which theory of mind is behind it — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- Functionalism: if consciousness is just what the brain computes, silicon can run it too — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- iPhone case with 85,000 reviews in days: everything fake in the age of abundance — tekbog · 2026-10-27
- Whether AI can be conscious depends on your definition: five frameworks for thinking about it — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- dunkhippo33 Shares How He Thinks About Raising Kids in the AI Era — kimmonismus · 2026-10-27