DeepSeek V4.1 Flash beats V4 Pro in retest: 24/105 vs 16/105 at lower cost
PawelHuryn · x · 2026-09-10
PawelHuryn retested DeepSeek models with effort=max and found V4.1 Flash clearly outperforms V4 Pro:
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 16/105, $1.89, 37 min
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max): 24/105, $1.08, 42.6 min
Flash scores 50% higher while costing less; the author concludes V4.1 Flash is the better pick.
Related event: Bug Hunt Bench Tests 105 Real Bugs; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Stands Out on Cost(8 posts)→
More from Models
- Grok Voice Think Fast 2.0 High tops speech-to-speech leaderboard on task success — XFreeze · 2026-09-11
- Fable and Astra fail at the XY problem: eager executors with zero pushback and no metacognition — teodorio · 2026-09-11
- 'Chart Crime': Blogger Flags Cropped TerminalBench 4.0 Chart Underrating DeepSeek V4.1 — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- Real API pricing method ranks subscriptions: GPT-5.6 Luna cheapest at $0.00083/MTok — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-11
- ThursdAI weekly: Astra, Navier Stokes, Muse assistant and more AI news — thursdai_pod · 2026-09-10
- DeepSeek v4.1-flash reportedly much better at subagent orchestration — adonis_singh · 2026-09-10