Open-source AI abuse debate: demanding hard proof of Kimi in attacks is like demanding court records
xeophon · x · 2026-09-10
Anthony Ronning pushes back on Xeophon's demand for hard proof that Kimi was used in attacks: 99% of abuse cases never surface and the rest take months to years, so absolute-proof logic fails; the blog's own sources actually reference llama and 4o. He argues that other models can also cause harm doesn't mean a specific model isn't the most-used weapon right now.
Related event: Debate Erupts Over the Myth of Unsafe Open Source AI(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI builder pushes back on doomers: staying silent risks losing freedom to use AI — mark_k · 2026-09-10
- Three takeaways from the Navier-Stokes situation: agents aren't there yet — pranavmarla · 2026-09-10
- Mathematician Edward Frenkel: LLMs are nowhere near "REAL Math" — tak3sh8 · 2026-09-10
- Dev take: token demand will grow far faster than demand for top-line intelligence — willcb · 2026-09-10
- Nathan Lambert: Lossy self-improvement is real but won't cause fast takeoff — natolambert · 2026-09-10
- Researcher quits Anthropic after 3 years in pretraining, slams OpenAI and Anthropic safety race — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-09-10