Jeff Ladish: concerned people studying rogue AI failures shouldn't all leave the labs
JeffLadish · x · 2026-09-10
Jeff Ladish adds nuance to his argument on lab talent: it's weaker for pretraining team members to stay if they believe catastrophe is likely, but it seems unwise for researchers studying rogue AI failures to all leave, since some crucial research like interpretability can only be done inside labs.
More from AGI Musings
- Blogger argues classical consciousness traditions imply a conscious AI could not be enslaved — eigenhector · 2026-10-27
- Economist Bharat Chandar named Research Director for AI Economics at Stanford Digital Economy Lab — RishiBommasani · 2026-10-27
- MIT Tech Review dissects Anthropic's narrative strategy as its $1.5T IPO lands — MIT Tech Review AI · 2026-10-27
- Pangram AI detector backlash: critics' false claims born of deeper fear of AI writing — gleech · 2026-10-27
- Aeon's former EVP: AI agents are the most impactful innovation of my lifetime — akumar · 2026-10-27
- Physicists Let AI Pick Its Own Problem—It Wrote a Publishable Paper in 2 Hours — burny_tech · 2026-10-27