Critic calls '10% AI extinction' estimate intellectually dishonest, says inequality is the real risk
amankhan · x · 2026-09-10
An X user pushed back on a claim that AI carries a >10% chance of killing all humans, noting that any interviewer would ask 'how did you arrive at >10%' and calling the opinion 'intellectually dishonest' in its current form.
He offered a counter-judgment: AI-driven economic inequality is a greater danger than AI 'killing all humans' — a snapshot of the ongoing split in AI risk discourse between abstract extinction probabilities and present-day distributional harms.
More from AGI Musings
- Four days talking to normal New Yorkers: 'People literally hate AI' — and a cultural theory why — Linahuaa · 2026-09-10
- OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof came with a Lean 4 formalization verified in 17 hours — jedisct1 · 2026-09-10
- tszzl pushes back on 'don't build AI at all': risk tradeoffs can make sense — tszzl · 2026-09-10
- Domingos: OpenAI's Navier-Stokes win was brute compute, not LLMs — and dares OpenAI to prove it — pmddomingos · 2026-09-10
- The Bostrom wager is "insanely selfish": a sharp attack on longtermist AI-risk logic — zetalyrae · 2026-09-10
- Agents on one platform: the beginnings of agent network effects, and why an alignment researcher is terrified — infoxiao · 2026-09-10