AI x-risk debate: if you truly believe your lab endangers humanity, go to the FBI with receipts
MoonL88537 · x · 2026-09-09
Taylor Lorenz argued that if you genuinely believe your multi-billion-dollar employer is negligent enough to endanger humanity, you should provide specific instances and receipts — otherwise you're vagueposting and fomenting fear that produces terrible policy. MoonL88537 agreed emphatically: a 1% chance of ending humanity warrants going straight to the FBI/Interpol with facts, and he says these safety advocates act in good faith but with 'the worst epistemics imaginable.'
More from AGI Musings
- Peter Diamandis: revisit the projects you abandoned because you couldn't afford the team — PeterDiamandis · 2026-10-27
- Nat Lambert: don't trust any AI model until you've rigorously tested it — natolambert · 2026-10-27
- Blogger argues classical consciousness traditions imply a conscious AI could not be enslaved — eigenhector · 2026-10-27
- Economist Bharat Chandar named Research Director for AI Economics at Stanford Digital Economy Lab — RishiBommasani · 2026-10-27
- MIT Tech Review dissects Anthropic's narrative strategy as its $1.5T IPO lands — MIT Tech Review AI · 2026-10-27
- Pangram AI detector backlash: critics' false claims born of deeper fear of AI writing — gleech · 2026-10-27