Sebastien Bubeck clarifies GPT-5 paper dispute, collaborator slams academia's incentive problem
DeryaTR_ · x · 2026-09-09
OpenAI researcher Sebastien Bubeck responded to controversy around the GPT-5 science case study involving a Princeton mathematician.
- Bubeck says the leaked screenshot only shows him reaching out to coordinate release timing, and he never asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work.
- He learned during a call that the other team had only solved the Euler problem, not Navier-Stokes; options discussed included Tristan leading a rewrite of OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof.
- A collaborator on the paper publicly defended Bubeck as one of the most scientifically ethical researchers they've met, noting the accuser himself used OpenAI and Anthropic models on the same math problems.
- The thread broadens into a critique of academic incentives that reward career advancement and priority over expanding knowledge.
More from Companies & People
- OpenAI's Shyamal Anadkat recruiting founding members for computation-physics-chemistry venture — shyamalanadkat · 2026-10-25
- OpenAI DevDay Exchange Berlin: DevRel team hosts ambassadors ahead of the event — paw_lean · 2026-10-25
- OpenAI and Anthropic week 43: Claude Duet, drug-discovery lead via GPT-Rosalind, life sciences open call — btibor91 · 2026-10-25
- Sebastian Raschka releases 11-hour 'Build Your Own Reasoning Model' video course — rasbt · 2026-10-25
- Ex-Slack engineer's 'eaten by the whale' essay explains why Slack barely evolved under Salesforce — Danhightower · 2026-10-25
- 10-step roadmap to a $250K+ 'Product Builder' job, from analyzing 10,000+ PM job posts — aakashgupta · 2026-10-25