NYU prof Tristan Buckmaster offers alternative view on OpenAI's Navier-Stokes claim
JitendraMalikCV · x · 2026-09-09
CV researcher Jitendra Malik amplified NYU math professor Tristan Buckmaster's response to OpenAI's Navier-Stokes claim, arguing that after such a bold statement it's important to hear alternative points of view on how the result actually came about. The substance lies in Buckmaster's pushback on OpenAI's scientific claim; verification and follow-up are worth watching.
Related event: OpenAI's Claim of Solving Navier-Stokes Draws Sharp Academic Backlash(6 posts)→
More from Research
- The Mathematics Autoformalization Project: translating all known math into formal code — burny_tech · 2026-09-09
- OpenFrontier (RSS 2026): zero-shot open-world robot navigation with VLM-scored frontiers — rsasaki0109 · 2026-09-09
- Open problems turned into RL environments: benchmarks and RL envs are two sides of the same coin — burny_tech · 2026-09-09
- ICML 2026 outstanding paper drama: concurrent diffusion sampling result, only one got the award — peter_richtarik · 2026-09-09
- UrbanLLMind: 10k memory-equipped LLM agents simulate a week of real San Francisco movement — anas_ant · 2026-09-09
- Radial Science commits $20M to Prism to make protein motion measurable and actionable — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-09