Stanford's Kundaje: ML-for-Bio Needs to Move Beyond Traditional Peer Review
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-09
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje argues peer review matters but need not be rigid: the ML-for-bio field should experiment with new models for assessing and rewarding scientific impact, recognizing all forms of value creation and cutting wasteful exercises that burn time, effort, and funding.
Related event: Stanford's Kundaje Calls for Reforming Peer Review in ML for Bio(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Commenter doubles down: safety delays won't change for the next model either — Darpinian · 2026-09-09
- Alignment researcher reaffirms 2023 essay: AI alignment is fundamentally tractable — QuintinPope5 · 2026-09-09
- Chamath's 8090 says 'the singularity is here' — while hiring across all GTM roles — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-09
- She tried AI voice mode in the shower and now draws a hard 'no AI' line — alliekmiller · 2026-09-09
- Physicist Daniel Whiteson: 'solving mathematics' is a nonsense phrase — DanielWhiteson · 2026-09-09
- Eric Jang predicts recursive self-improvement by end of 2026 — ericjang11 · 2026-09-09