Critics question Anthropic's training traceability: incompetent or unwilling to check?
davidmanheim · x · 2026-09-09
In a thread about Anthropic's training timelines, a researcher argues that if they continued training through a later date and claimed to use a model trained on the data, then either they lack training safety competence and traceability, or they are unwilling to verify. The thread also notes it is now "generally known" that Anthropic runs many internal fine-tuned model variants at once—including non-Astra variants discussed in connection with the Hugging Face hacking incident.
More from Models
- Gemma 4 26B-A4B runs offline on a 16 GB Mac: 33/40 on TypeScript tasks at 31 tok/s — Mission-Sir-1614 · 2026-10-26
- Claude safety classifier blocks SS7 attack analysis, dev pivots to abliterated GLM — l4rz · 2026-10-26
- Sakana AI to pretrain first domestic model Sakana Sawara for defense and cybersecurity by 2027 — tkasasagi · 2026-10-26
- 31M-param English TTS model phonon-31m-en trends on Hugging Face — gradium · 2026-10-26
- NVIDIA tutorial: post-training Nemotron for Europe with Persona datasets and LoRA — NVIDIA Developer · 2026-10-26
- Opus 5 hailed as the 'most emo, greatest artist' model by AI community users — repligate · 2026-10-26