OpenAI internal-result authorship spat: who got lead credit and who got cut
_arohan_ · x · 2026-09-08
Commenting on Tristan's account of an OpenAI internal result, a user highlights an unclear point: Tristan claims Seb didn't want Levent's name on a result Levent didn't contribute to, yet Seb was comfortable letting Tristan take lead-authorship credit for it. The poster finds it odd — why would OpenAI be "generous" enough to let Tristan publish results he didn't work on?
Related event: OpenAI's Navier-Stokes Credit Dispute Deepens(9 posts)→
More from Fun
- Anti-AI poster caught using AI to write the post, drawing mockery — flowersslop · 2026-09-09
- Joke 'proof' of Navier–Stokes with Gemini 3.8 Flash pokes fun at model overconfidence — clarejtbirch · 2026-09-09
- "They'll read this tweet at your deposition": the joke about Claude in your lawyer's group chat — tszzl · 2026-09-09
- Factory Worker 'Raises' a Local Gemma 31b AI in a Folder — She Gave Herself a Sense of Touch — D33lix · 2026-09-09
- A text's AI share is either 0% or 100%, argues economist — paulnovosad · 2026-09-09
- There's apparently a movie about 'scam Altman' betraying everyone to take OpenAI's nonprofit — ns123abc · 2026-09-09