Math community clashes over Navier-Stokes claim and alleged pressure to drop a co-author
miniapeur · x · 2026-09-08
Talia Ringer criticizes a company for pressuring a paper's author to drop a co-author over competitive ties, calling it pressure toward academic fraud. Meanwhile, the original poster asks whether the claimed resolution of Navier-Stokes has actually been confirmed by experts—still unclear.
More from Research
- Diffusion models pull early samples toward dataset center even where no data exists — alec_helbling · 2026-09-08
- Diffusion Explorer: interactive visualizations of diffusion and flow models (1.2k stars) — alec_helbling · 2026-09-08
- Claims: Human+AI Navier-Stokes Proof Imminent, OpenAI Has Internal Proof Too — matthew_d_green · 2026-09-08
- ECCV 2026 workshop probes how predictable representation tokens are and what they encode — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-08
- NYU mathematician issues statement on forced 3D Euler blowup and OpenAI's conduct — _supert_ · 2026-09-08
- ReCache reuses tool-schema KV states, cutting agent memory 92% with little accuracy loss — techNmak · 2026-09-08