No continuous learning, no AGI: why you should discount Huang and Brockman's AGI hype
StewartalsopIII · x · 2026-09-08
A viral take argues you should heavily downweight anyone claiming Astra is AGI — including Jensen Huang and Greg Brockman — because they "have bags to sell." The author's bar for AGI: continuous learning and indefinite context. Without those, it's not AGI, no matter who says otherwise.
More from AGI Musings
- After GPT-6 Astra, Brockman Hedged on AGI While Jensen Huang Declared the Era Has Begun — Alec_Coughlin · 2026-09-08
- Karpathy breaks down AGI timelines after Dwarkesh podcast: 'decade of agents,' not AGI yet — Gauri_the_great · 2026-09-08
- Kokotajlo's AI 2040 Plan A: pause AI to build safety before superintelligence — Machine Learning Street Talk · 2026-09-08
- AI may discover unknown math while humans shift to learning and explaining it — arjunrajlab · 2026-09-08
- Would generally intelligent AI agents simply not act agentically? Alignment debate — JMannhart · 2026-09-08
- Worthy Successor NYC AGI event set for Sep 26, drawing lab policy and safety figures — danfaggella · 2026-09-08