Blameless postmortems shouldn't shield the organizations that set the incentives, researcher argues
DavidSKrueger · x · 2026-09-08
zetalyrae sparked a discussion on the limits of blameless postmortems: their purpose is to avoid blaming individuals so we can understand the incentives that led to an incident — not to shield the organizations that define those incentives from blame. David Krueger amplified the take.
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI mocked over alleged internal roadmap claim of reaching AGI by end of 2026 — scaling01 · 2026-09-08
- scaling01 mocks OpenAI's attempt to claim it has achieved AGI — scaling01 · 2026-09-08
- Economist says AI helps poor writers; ex-official fires back: poor writing means poor thinking — zetalyrae · 2026-09-08
- Power user burns through Pro limits on Astra, verdict: not AGI, just a bigger code monkey — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-08
- Nicolas Cole: In the age of AI, commodity content is worthless — only personalized content is yours — yangyi · 2026-09-08
- When Juries Deadlock, AI Could Decide: AI Tools Enter Criminal Justice — TobyWalsh · 2026-09-08