IEEE T-PAMI editor confirms ghost reviewer in case of paper rejected despite 'Excellent' scores
cussealin · reddit · 2026-09-07
An update to a MachineLearning subreddit saga: the author who questioned how their paper was rejected from IEEE T-PAMI despite 'Excellent' review scores reports that the Editor-in-Chief has confirmed a ghost reviewer was involved. The incident raises serious concerns about review integrity at top venues.
More from Research
- Thousands of AI drug discovery firms, only a handful of end-to-end automated labs — robleclerc · 2026-09-08
- Insilico's AI drug Rentosertib shows 3-4 year biological age reversal in 12 weeks — NinaDSchick · 2026-09-08
- Speridlabs releases ENEAS, a text-promptable tracking method claiming gains over SAM3 — joecole · 2026-09-08
- UCL's Large Discovery Models hit SOTA, 2.4x LLM reflection on experiment search — jiqizhixin · 2026-09-08
- First IAB workshop on agent behavior draws 260 submissions, seeks reviewers — mdredze · 2026-09-08
- Dr. Claw: Open-Source AI Scientist Workspace Wrapping Coding Agents for Auditable Research — Dingjie Song · 2026-09-08