IEEE T-PAMI editor confirms ghost reviewer in case of paper rejected despite 'Excellent' scores
cussealin · reddit · 2026-09-07
An update to a MachineLearning subreddit saga: the author who questioned how their paper was rejected from IEEE T-PAMI despite 'Excellent' review scores reports that the Editor-in-Chief has confirmed a ghost reviewer was involved. The incident raises serious concerns about review integrity at top venues.
More from Research
- FocusVLA routes robot camera views by predicted interaction intent across task stages — iscas-cloud · 2026-10-26
- Transformers' biggest audio overhaul: unified AudioProcessor architecture — LysandreJik · 2026-10-26
- Free 195-page primer: The Little Book of Generative AI Foundations — caglar_ee · 2026-10-26
- SPADER from Zhejiang and Peking University Tops All Four Multi-Answer QA Benchmarks, Accepted at EMNLP — jiqizhixin · 2026-10-26
- Purdue's GPS-free autonomous drone tracks runners through dense forests using on-chip LiDAR AI — KordingLab · 2026-10-26
- LLM drug recommendations converge on single products, averaging 97.5% of first picks — EricTopol · 2026-10-26