Gary Marcus cites hands-on review: Astra is the best planner but a terrible coder
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-09-07
Gary Marcus quotes a detailed two-day hands-on review of GPT-6 Astra, highlighting its weaknesses: poor execution — awful code, tons of mistakes, can't build even trivial action sequences, "acts first and thinks later," and has never delivered a bug-free result on the first try; building projects with it is "painful."
The original review also credits Astra's strengths: currently the best planner, tackling complex technical tasks thoroughly and unconventionally, and the world's best auditor/reviewer, finding tricky bugs even advanced QA teams miss. Before Astra, only Sol earned that trust.
More from coding & agent
- Reticle builds a verification layer that lets AI coding agents check their own generated code — Scobleizer · 2026-10-27
- Dev training a guard model to block prompt injection, tool and memory poisoning — gnukeith · 2026-10-27
- Dev trains a ~4GB-VRAM sentinel model to guard against prompt injection and poisoned memory — gnukeith · 2026-10-27
- Ex-Big Tech managers may thrive in the AI era: manage agents like you managed teams — lxfater · 2026-10-27
- Claude debugs airline and hotel sites; Fasano's date picker is all NaN and invalid dates — lilyraynyc · 2026-10-27
- SF 'Code Engineering' event picks up where 1,000-person harness engineering meetup left off — LangChain · 2026-10-27