Pinker argues doomer extinction narratives starve real AI risks like cybersecurity
Dr_Atoosa · x · 2026-09-06
Weighing in on criticism around Cal Newport's piece, the author offers a charitable reading of Pinker's post: the classic doomer AI-extinction narrative — a singleton or family of superintelligent AIs wiping out humanity — has monopolized scarce attention that could have gone to concrete, nearer-term risks like cybersecurity and biosecurity. The author doesn't fully endorse Newport but says the EA and Yudkowskian rationalist communities did a disservice (alongside service) to AI governance and its discourse, something careful people should acknowledge.
More from AGI Musings
- Banker: letting agents impersonate humans could leave banks liable for errors — neal_lathia · 2026-09-06
- AI journalism is improving, says Read Transformer founder who launched it to fix coverage — ShakeelHashim · 2026-09-06
- Harvard and Santa Fe Institute paper frames LLMs as a 'cognitive virus' — mikeflache · 2026-09-06
- gfodor: The "AI can't write" meme is misleading — LLM prose is highly steerable via samples — nptacek · 2026-09-06
- Researcher Argues AI Doomer Extinction Narrative Crowds Out Cybersecurity and Biosecurity Risks — Dr_Atoosa · 2026-09-06
- AI slop in technical writing is a leading indicator of a new medium, says dev — threepointone · 2026-09-06