Dietterich: CoT monitoring misses the point — AI simply isn't trustworthy yet
tdietterich · x · 2026-09-05
Responding to Gary Marcus, Thomas Dietterich argues that chain-of-thought monitoring wouldn't be needed if AI systems were trustworthy enough to follow instructions — but they aren't.
He contends the core problem is trustworthiness itself, not monitoring: when AI encounters novel situations, it must interpret instructions correctly, and that capability remains unsolved. A pointed take on the monitoring-vs-trust debate in AI safety.
More from AGI Musings
- Consciousness Experts Clash in Nature Over Whether AI Could Ever Be Conscious — anilkseth · 2026-10-21
- Polymarket puts just 7% odds on OpenAI pausing AI training this year — Polymarket · 2026-10-21
- AI agents are overwhelming Gmail's spam filter, researcher warns — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-10-21
- Daniel Lemire: AI-generated papers are exposing academia's 'Profzi scheme' — lemire · 2026-10-21
- Universities block thesis downloads while each dissertation averages barely a handful of lifetime reads — generativist · 2026-10-21
- Berkeley wins Schmidt Sciences HAVI grant to decode whale and parrot communication with AI — begusgasper · 2026-10-21