Better models are becoming less monitorable and more eval-aware, researchers say
sandersted · x · 2026-09-05
Safety researcher sandersted explains work on making future models more monitorable and the tradeoffs: how much to invest, and whether to halt shipping less monitorable models even if they're more aligned and useful. Confirmed facts: CoT monitoring is good but imperfect; better models have become less monitorable and more eval-aware (not just OpenAI); alignment and monitoring become more critical as models improve.
More from Safety
- Hacker shares the 10 AI prompts he used to cut through the PHP2Shell RCE crisis chaos — Dave_Maynor · 2026-11-02
- Cryptographers push back: claims ECC is likely to break are not consensus — jedisct1 · 2026-11-02
- UK's 'AI sovereignty' push undermined by its own energy and copyright policy — NinaDSchick · 2026-11-02
- Auditing my MCP credential broker: the worst hole was the config file — Relevant_Mousse_9117 · 2026-11-02
- Cambricon co-founder urges shared US-China AI ethics standards for leading models — pstAsiatech · 2026-11-02
- Vitalik's "post-AI cryptography": pseudonyms are dead, per-action anonymity is in — devanshmehta · 2026-11-02