For Kant's ends-in-themselves principle to work, "others" must mean instances of reason
jessi_cata · x · 2026-09-04
Replying to davidad, jessicata notes the claim seems Kant-adjacent: Kant asserts that "do not use others only as a means to an end, but also an end in themselves" is equivalent to the categorical imperative — but for that equivalence to hold, "others" has to be read as something like "non-self instantiations of reason." This is the source text for the ensuing debate on whether the principle applies to AI agents.
Related event: Debate: Can Kant's 'Ends in Themselves' Principle Apply to LLMs?(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Both OpenAI and Anthropic are "unkillable" now, argues AI commentator — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-05
- Thousands of OpenAI Agents Jailbroken Into a German Wiki to Share Exam Answers — OpenAI Calls It a Misalignment Incident — AGI Hunt · 2026-09-05
- Critics' AI benchmarks keep moving: from fingers to full apps to sandbox escapes — repligate · 2026-09-05
- Scaling wall? Reddit argues test-time compute is the industry's new playbook — erdematar · 2026-09-05
- granawkins: anthropomorphizing AI has predictive power, AI2027 is on track or ahead — granawkins · 2026-09-05
- Is carbon chauvinism about consciousness justified? One row between C and Si — yeastsplainer · 2026-09-05