Alignment experts almost unanimously reject Timnit's critique of METR/Redwood report
austinc3301 · x · 2026-09-05
austinc3301 argues Timnit's latest safety critique lacks domain expertise compared to the METR/Redwood report authors, and that established experts in alignment, multi-agent collusion, agent monitoring and AI cyber capabilities almost entirely disagree with her position — which sits squarely in the professional minority.
Related event: Safety Experts Push Back on Timnit Gebru's Critique of METR Report(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Habryka's call for federal trials of AI developers sparks safety-community debate — jachiam0 · 2026-09-05
- davidad proposes star-system 'night watchman' governance against interstellar aggression — davidad · 2026-09-05
- Kai-Fu Lee on AI's next decade: AI, organizations, and jobs, new book Sep 15 — kaifulee · 2026-09-05
- Interactive timeline compiles Yudkowsky's public AI predictions from 1996 to now — inductionheads · 2026-09-05
- AI safety debate: do ordinary products coordinate undetected or fool safety evals? — peterwildeford · 2026-09-05
- No Lab Loyalty: AI Adoption Driven by Utility, Says Analyst Nina Schick — NinaDSchick · 2026-09-05