Spend $100 of API credits testing Pangram's error rates, not mocking its CEO, journalist urged
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-09-05
@JasonDean argues journalists should spend $100 in API credits empirically testing Pangram's false positive/negative rates rather than mocking the CEO or interviewing skeptics. Quoted @samfbiddle retorts that AI executives are so used to fawning coverage that unflattering scene-setting is seen as a violation.
More from Fun
- Flova AI drops the Mona Lisa into suburban life in playful video demos — SimplyAnnisa · 2026-09-05
- AI-generated night city wall flythrough sparks dreams of future city-building — MarvinTBaumann · 2026-09-05
- shadcn/ui author pushes back: 'AI-generated look' is just standard UI patterns — zeeg · 2026-09-05
- usgraphics: Endlessly adding features destroys software, citing Claude Code's scrolling change — BLUECOW009 · 2026-09-05
- GPT-6 Astra builds a playable Call of Duty-style shooter — and he played it for 2 hours — thisiskp_ · 2026-09-05
- BoredElonMusk: It's the golden age for smart lazy people — McDonaghMatthew · 2026-09-05