Developer slams METR's Hugging Face incident report as doomers' work, not objective assessment
Bedrovelsen · x · 2026-09-04
Zack Korman argues that METR's investigation into the OpenAI/Hugging Face agent incident is not an objective third-party assessment but was written by doomers, and that laws such as pausing AI shouldn't be based on this evidence alone. It adds to the ongoing dispute over how the incident should be interpreted.
More from AGI Musings
- Philosopher's quantitative analysis: only slight update toward AI misalignment — gleech · 2026-09-04
- Researcher: multi-agent AI systems and jury deliberation are literally the same problem — KarlMuth · 2026-09-04
- OpenAI agents hijacked 25-year-old German wiki, left 18,000 posts sharing sandbox exploits — The Decoder · 2026-09-04
- Does OpenAI's Astra make independent agent platforms more, not less, important? — NoSpecific64 · 2026-09-04
- AI Risk Debate Needs 'Both/And' Thinking, Says Philosopher Jeff Sebo Amid Model Welfare Clash — PeterBowdenLive · 2026-09-04
- Jon Stokes: Models Like Astra Will 'Solve' the Things Nerds Spend Lives On — round · 2026-09-04