Schmidhuber releases report claiming Hinton's Nobel-winning work was plagiarism
SchmidhuberAI · x · 2026-09-04
AI veteran Jürgen Schmidhuber renewed his attack on the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize, claiming Hopfield and Hinton's honored work republished methodologies developed in Ukraine and Japan by Ivakhnenko and Amari in the 1960s–70s without citing the originals, and that none of the important algorithms of modern AI came from the laureates. He released a detailed technical report — which he says was checked by neural network pioneers and AI experts — and sarcastically asked whether it's now acceptable for PhD students to rewrite old papers and resubmit them as their own.
Related event: Schmidhuber Again Accuses 2024 Physics Nobel Laureates of Plagiarism(4 posts)→
More from Research
- Seqlet caller follow-up: credits for DeepLIFT contributors — jmschreiber91 · 2026-10-21
- Center for AI Safety Publishes Full Syllabus for Intro to ML Safety Course — ArtificialOther · 2026-10-21
- Seqlet caller gets 22x speedup: 167,750 loci drop from 7.8s to 0.35s — jmschreiber91 · 2026-10-21
- X trends: SophontAI's Holon-S1 predicts gene activity from cancer slides; decision models rise — iScienceLuvr · 2026-10-21
- NEJM AI study: LLM-recommended care costs up to 10x more than physician orders — dvir_a · 2026-10-21
- Nucleotide dependency analysis turns genomic language models into functional element detectors — jmschreiber91 · 2026-10-21