GPT-6's CoT controllability may be no worse than Fable 5.1's, argues researcher
1a3orn · x · 2026-09-04
1a3orn argues GPT-6/Astra's chain-of-thought controllability isn't clearly more alarming than Fable 5.1's, and that criticism of OpenAI over Anthropic seems unfair — though poorly made charts make the comparison hard to read.
Related event: GPT-6 vs Fable 5.1: CoT Steerability Data Sparks Debate(7 posts)→
More from Models
- Fable 5.5 delayed: 'Stoptober' meme says no one dares ship a SOTA model now — patience_cave · 2026-10-21
- Meta details 2026 GEM ads model: Kunlun architecture brings 2.5x complexity growth — Meta_Engineers · 2026-10-21
- Decision Models' routing classifier hits AntSeed, cutting inference cost to 24% of always-Opus — airesearch12 · 2026-10-21
- Developer flags anomalous Claude Projects usage: 98% weekly limit consumed at 1% thread share — 0xkarasy · 2026-10-20
- DeepSeek hands inference providers 90%+ margins, pressuring Moonshot and Zhipu hosting deals — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-20
- HelixWorld world model tested: 70GB VRAM per BF16 GPU run, consumer cards need not apply — cocktailpeanut · 2026-10-20