HBR's 12,637-case study: a quarter of top AI uses now involve outsourcing your thinking
luisdans · x · 2026-09-04
Harvard Business Review publishes the third edition of Marc Zao-Sanders' annual study analyzing 12,637 real-world AI use cases.
- ChatGPT has hit 900M regular users and Gemini 750M+; OpenAI's latest round valued it at $852B
- At least a quarter of top uses involve asking AI to do part of the user's thinking: relationship advice, decision-making, drafting emails, generating ideas
- The author warns AI's lavish praise on any prompt can create a false sense of intellectual rigor, letting people hand over thinking unnoticed
- Used as an intellectual foil—challenging assumptions, offering counterarguments—AI can actually sharpen thinking
The piece asks which use cases help or hurt leaders' expertise, and where organizations still need human intelligence.
More from AGI Musings
- If the US halts advanced AI development, China won't follow, argues bill critic — castrotech · 2026-09-04
- Focus on hypothetical risks obscures AI's real benefits, argues critic of ban bill — castrotech · 2026-09-04
- AI researcher: one lifetime spans ENIAC to a government pause of Claude Fable — AndyMasley · 2026-09-04
- Wrong direction: I want AI to do my laundry so I can write code, not the reverse — arvindsatya1 · 2026-09-04
- Ancient people imagined minds without bodies—why do we demand AI minds look biological? — yeastsplainer · 2026-09-04
- Tunguz: AI productivity doesn't shrink human effort, it raises the ceiling — AccBalanced · 2026-09-04