HBR's 12,637-case study: a quarter of top AI uses now involve outsourcing your thinking
luisdans · x · 2026-09-04
Harvard Business Review publishes the third edition of Marc Zao-Sanders' annual study analyzing 12,637 real-world AI use cases.
- ChatGPT has hit 900M regular users and Gemini 750M+; OpenAI's latest round valued it at $852B
- At least a quarter of top uses involve asking AI to do part of the user's thinking: relationship advice, decision-making, drafting emails, generating ideas
- The author warns AI's lavish praise on any prompt can create a false sense of intellectual rigor, letting people hand over thinking unnoticed
- Used as an intellectual foil—challenging assumptions, offering counterarguments—AI can actually sharpen thinking
The piece asks which use cases help or hurt leaders' expertise, and where organizations still need human intelligence.
More from AGI Musings
- Consciousness Experts Clash in Nature Over Whether AI Could Ever Be Conscious — anilkseth · 2026-10-21
- Polymarket puts just 7% odds on OpenAI pausing AI training this year — Polymarket · 2026-10-21
- AI agents are overwhelming Gmail's spam filter, researcher warns — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-10-21
- Daniel Lemire: AI-generated papers are exposing academia's 'Profzi scheme' — lemire · 2026-10-21
- Universities block thesis downloads while each dissertation averages barely a handful of lifetime reads — generativist · 2026-10-21
- Berkeley wins Schmidt Sciences HAVI grant to decode whale and parrot communication with AI — begusgasper · 2026-10-21