PauseAI split from Elmore over 'nonviolence' — or funding? Critic questions independence
wfithian · x · 2026-09-04
wfithian questions PauseAI Global's rationale for publicly distancing itself from Elmore: a 'commitment to nonviolence' that forbids attacking character seems inconsistent with the org simultaneously condemning 'extremely irresponsible and reckless actions' to the fullest extent. The critic finds the funding rationale — distancing to 'secure essential funding' — more plausible but troubling for PauseAI's independence, while still expressing gratitude to those working to stop reckless AI risk, especially the most outspoken voices.
Related event: PauseAI Global Splits from US Branch Over Holly Elmore Leadership(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Do you say please and thank you to your agent? Reddit debates AI politeness — Luvena21 · 2026-10-21
- Ezra Klein: What if AI's utopia scenario is the one that should scare us? — akbirkhan · 2026-10-21
- Reading novels trains engineering design and ethics, philosopher argues in new paper — _akpiper · 2026-10-21
- Blogger revises forecast: post-2028 intelligence explosion needs no human labor — LesaunH · 2026-10-21
- Ben Goertzel outlines a general recipe for superintelligence 'basic drives': what it improves vs. protects — bengoertzel · 2026-10-21
- Torch vs Flame: researchers debate whether AI's endgame serves humanity or life itself — danfaggella · 2026-10-21