Pedro Domingos proposes scrapping accept/reject: reviewers rate papers, attendees vote on what gets in
pmddomingos · x · 2026-09-04
AI researcher Pedro Domingos proposes rethinking peer review: reviewers shouldn't accept or reject papers, only rate them on correctness, importance, novelty, and clarity. Conference attendees would then vote on which papers they'd like to see, with top-ranked ones chosen — shifting selection power from a few reviewers to the research community.
More from Research
- WeatherNext 3 details: real-time satellite training, hourly 5-km forecasts, 60% CRPS gain vs IMERG — ymatias · 2026-09-04
- Google launches WeatherNext 3: AI weather model with real-time satellite data and hourly updates — ymatias · 2026-09-04
- Google DeepMind publishes 'Understanding Life at Every Scale' on AI for biology — GoogleDeepMind · 2026-09-04
- Fruit fly connectome complete, but human connectome still a long way off — BraydonDymm · 2026-09-04
- A throwaway line about CoT-monitor classifier tech may signal a major alignment breakthrough — tszzl · 2026-09-04
- 20 minutes on one H200: GRPO post-training makes Qwen 3.5-2B more accurate and token-efficient — johnolafenwa · 2026-09-04