Consciousness Scientist Anil Seth Slams AI Philosophy Prize as Bandwagonny
anilkseth · x · 2026-09-03
Consciousness researcher Anil Seth (University of Sussex) voiced discontent with a prize for AI solving philosophical problems. Unlike maths, philosophy lacks open problems with provable solutions, he argues; such prizes juice up the narrative of cognitive outsourcing rather than amplification and feel "distastefully bandwagonny." Still, he'll happily eat a chocolate hat if Claude solves the hard problem of consciousness to general satisfaction. His interlocutor noted it's genuinely hard to find philosophy puzzles that are both computationally tractable and underexplored.
Related event: Anil Seth Criticizes AI Philosophy Prize, Sparking Debate(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Three reasons AI is not conscious and may never be, per Nature essay — anilkseth · 2026-10-21
- Everything in AI is downstream of a global status graph, says founder — gabriel1 · 2026-10-21
- Attention decays fast: breakout moments must recur every 6-12 months — gabriel1 · 2026-10-21
- Mathematician Daniel Litt concedes his AI bet, but says AI won't solve math — ziv_ravid · 2026-10-21
- AI SaaS monetization is cooked: consumers small, enterprises pay $20/month — menhguin · 2026-10-21
- Tim Dettmers: Academia is about to have a renaissance — the best AI work of the next decade happens in university labs — StasBekman · 2026-10-21