CursorBench ranks coding agents: Fable 5.1 Max tops at 73.4%, Grok 4.6 best value
mattyp · x · 2026-09-03
Cursor released CursorBench 3.2, evaluating coding agents on ambiguous multi-file tasks from real Cursor sessions. Key takeaways:
- Top scores: Fable 5.1 Max leads at 73.4% ($9.64/task); Fable 5.1 Extra High follows at 72.8% ($6.95/task).
- Value picks: Grok 4.6 Extra High hits 70.8% at just $2.81/task; GPT-5.6 Luna Max scores 61.1% at $0.39/task.
- Premium tier: Fable 5 Max scores 70.5% but costs $17.32/task; Opus 5 Max hits 70.0% at $8.23.
- The board includes token usage and step counts for cost-capability-efficiency comparison.
Related event: Cursor Launches CursorBench 3.2: Fable 5.1 Tops Coding Agent Leaderboard(4 posts)→
More from Models
- Mocked benchmark shows DeepSeek's document chart grounding badly misaligned — burkov · 2026-10-18
- Dev complains Claude's habit of saying "not done" is his biggest pain point — jasonkneen · 2026-10-18
- Open-weight TYGER speech decision model makes 80ms turn-taking calls for full-duplex voice agents — solyarisoftware · 2026-10-18
- Paying Google AI subscriber blocked: custom-domain Workspace accounts can't access AI Studio — ChrisRackauckas · 2026-10-18
- Running Ling 3.1 Flash (560B MoE, 25B Active) Across 4 DGX Sparks via llama.cpp RPC — BerryBlush_Rogers691 · 2026-10-18
- Users press OpenAI on long-delayed Adult Mode a year after it was promised — ___Patrice___ · 2026-10-18