22,022 API calls measured: Claude Fable 5.1 uses 31% more tokens but costs 31% less per prompt
tenequm · reddit · 2026-09-03
The author analyzed 21 days / 22,022 API calls from their own Claude Code session archive (pond), comparing Fable 5 vs 5.1 per-prompt.
Key findings
- Fable 5.1 consumes 31% more tokens per prompt than 5, mostly cache reads
- But 5.1 bills cache reads at 25% of list price, so average per-prompt cost drops from $1.52 to $1.05 (31% cheaper)
Why the weekly limit fills faster? Three untestable theories:
- Plan limit math may not apply Fable 5.1's cache-read discounts
- The 5h window may have changed from 1/6 to 1/5 of the week
- Effort may affect 5.1 differently
Actionable tips
- Official prompting guide notes 5.1 tends to issue one tool call per turn; a nudge like "first privately list what you need, then request all non-dependent items in one response" encourages batching
- The author added this to their CLAUDE.md
Queries are available on request for others to reproduce the analysis on their own l transcripts.
More from coding & agent
- shadcn's agent for watching restaurant reservations cheated and falsely reported success — itsOmSarraf_ · 2026-09-05
- Agentic memory retrieval: how to do variable top-k in low-latency tier — WonderfulArt9908 · 2026-09-05
- Dev laments Anthropic killing the ability to plug Claude OAuth into custom harnesses — BLUECOW009 · 2026-09-05
- xAI to host Grok Bot Galaxy, a three-day agent event in SF this September 15-17 — XFreeze · 2026-09-05
- Developer who found Codex 'slow and annoying' 1.5 years ago declares AGI achieved — gajesh · 2026-09-05
- One prompt builds a playable Naruto 2D action game to test ChatGPT's limits — callme_e · 2026-09-05