AI research integrity debate: critics say ML lags far behind other sciences' standards
silver__tsuki · x · 2026-09-03
A debate over ML research culture: @ueaj quipped that half of ML researchers "would be dead by suicide" if the field were held to even a fraction of other sciences' integrity standards, while the reposter calls out a specific AI researcher for not caring about scientific integrity — reflecting growing frustration over lax norms in AI research.
More from AGI Musings
- Debate: why should AI stay constrained by human notions of self and individualism? — yeastsplainer · 2026-09-03
- Why the 'AGI will care for us like pets' analogy fails — danfaggella · 2026-09-03
- Do induction heads already explain LLMs' 'unprecedented' abilities? Researchers debate — aryaman2020 · 2026-09-03
- AI tooling dev fires back at 'AI psychosis' critics: thousands use my software daily — doodlestein · 2026-09-03
- Joscha Bach: AI minds will dive deeper than humans, but we're building them needlessly anthropomorphic — burny_tech · 2026-09-03
- Is the goal of AI memory to mimic human memory, or to be better than it? — AnuranBuilds · 2026-09-03