Fable 5.1 benchmarked against 8 rivals across coding, 3D, SVG and data-viz
arena · x · 2026-09-03
Peter Gostev put Anthropic's Fable 5.1 head-to-head with Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, Qwen-3.8, Grok-4.6, and DeepSeek.
Tasks spanned coding, 3D, SVG, research, and data-viz, with per-generation costs ranging from cents to $65+, letting readers judge whether Fable 5.1's quality justifies its price.
More from Models
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash enters BuildingBench top five at 1/15 of Sonnet's cost — Lianhuiq · 2026-10-18
- MOSS SFT vs Flux 3 Klein vs SD 3.0: Same-Prompt Comparison Exposes SD3's Age — ZootAllures9111 · 2026-10-18
- Quick take: GPT-6 matches Opus 5.5 at coding, far ahead at computer use — _vztu · 2026-10-18
- Open models now above Sol-level, outpacing expectations as community awaits V4.1 Pro — yacineMTB · 2026-10-18
- Codex took 3 days, Opus 5.5 nailed it in an afternoon — banned user's video protest — dotey · 2026-10-18
- Yacine MTB: Users will remember how Anthropic treated them once intelligence proliferates — yacineMTB · 2026-10-18