One ultracode session burned 42% of weekly limit, user slams Anthropic's Fable 5.1
BLUECOW009 · x · 2026-09-03
User LBacaj says Anthropic's new Fable 5.1 model is a joke: a single ultracode session consumed 42% of the weekly usage limit as sub-agents kept failing for no reason, then hit session limits retrying. In effect, over $80 of a $200/month plan's weekly quota was burned to failure.
More from coding & agent
- Stanford launches CS329Z, a new fall course on building AI agents from scratch — jyangballin · 2026-09-03
- Naveen Rao Says LLM Compiler Is Real: Turning Python Into Optimized Assembly, Guarantees Next — NaveenGRao · 2026-09-03
- Run Claude Code on Google Cloud in 60 seconds with gcloud auth and 3 env vars — fhinkel · 2026-09-03
- Full prompt released for single-file realistic three.js waterfall with WebGPU and TSL — majidmanzarpour · 2026-09-03
- Same-prompt test: fable 5.1 vs sol 5.6 generating a realistic three.js waterfall — majidmanzarpour · 2026-09-03
- Open-source Google Tasks MCP server ships 14 tools covering the full API — bantronline · 2026-09-03